Published in the Environmental Research Letters journal, in 2017. Main author: Hazel E. Thornton, from UK’s Met Office.
This article assessed the relationship between electricity demand and the availability of wind power, relating both of these to weather patterns affecting the UK region.
Like the previous article by some of the same authors, also covered in the our journal club (https://metclim.ucd.ie/2017/08/journal-club-18-07-2017/), the current article focused on the winter season, although for different reasons: the winter season encompasses both the highest electricity demand (therefore ED) and the highest variability in wind capacity factor (WP), when comparing with the rest of the year (see Figure 1 of the article).
Due to its intermittent nature, highest on winter, wind power has been questioned as a safe provider of electricity during high and peak electricity demand periods. Understanding what atmospheric patterns are associated with both winter wind power production and electricity demand will offer security to the energy grids by way of securing reserve power production – this can be achieved through forecasting of the atmospheric conditions associated with different WP and ED.
This is the motivation and rationale of the article.
As we can see in the figure bellow (left plot), for most of the ED percentiles, there is linear inverted relationship between WP and ED; for the peak ED though, there is an upturn, meaning that the highest percentiles of ED occur when WP starts to increase again. This same plot also shows us that the higher the meridional pressure difference (two boxes, one north of the UK, another south), the higher the WP. This pressure difference can be used to identify the general direction of the winds, and therefore the general temperature of the airmasses – e.g. winter air masses coming from the East are generally colder than airmasses coming from the West. This pressure difference can also be interpreted as a regional proxy of the NAO index.
If we look at the right plot of the same figure, we can see that the colder the air temperature, the higher the ED, which can probably be explained by the higher levels of heating – therefore associating temperature (therefore T) with ED, for the UK region.
Figure 1: Variation in UK’s average WP and meridional pressure difference between two regions-boxes north and south of the UK (left plot). Variation in ED and UK’s average temperature (right)
The authors then got the Sea Level Pressure (MSLP), T and WP fields (all from ERA reanalysis) associated with high ED (~30 years of real UK data) and applied a clustering technique (k-means) to see the pressure, temperature and WP patterns associated with those ED conditions (the last two fields, T and WP, are presented as anomalies and not absolute values). As one can see in the Figure 2, bellow, the authors identified 4 clusters with frequencies between ~20% and ~30% of occurrence each. All of the identified clusters demonstrate high pressure systems, although in different regions of Europe. The location of the pressure centers will condition the degree and extent of temperature anomalies in the UK and neighbours. Regarding WP, the picture is not that “consistent”, as expected from the previous plot – two of the clusters are associated with lower than normal WP, one associated with average WP, and one associated with above average WP (Cluster 1). Note: In this work, the authors assumed a uniform and geographical balanced distribution of wind farms, although they also performed other types of sensitivity analysis (using OBS of WP instead of reanalysis; averaging WP over different regions of the UK, both onshore and offsore) that guaranteed that the results are consistent, namely the ED-WP relationship.
One also has to notice that 3 of clusters/weather types show that in those weather conditions not only the UK but also its neighbours suffer from T and WP anomalies, which might make inter-national electricity balancing harder and/or more expensive, specially if those conditions are not predicted sufficiently ahead of time.
On the other hand, 3 of the clusters (not all the same as the previous) show some advantages on continental scale balancing of power, as southern Europe faces opposite anomalies to northern Europe, at least regarding WP.
Figure 2: Clusters of MSLP (left column) and T (middle) and WP (right) anomalies, obtained by K-means technique on those variables, when the ED is high.
- WP and T anomalous conditions are associated with different weather types with similar frequency of ocurrence in the winter;
- In general, weather patterns that bring low T and high ED to the UK also cause anomalously low temperatures across many parts of Europe. Consequently, regional balancing of power may not be enough to satisfy ED, as these weather patterns affect all of a region and its neighbours. On the other hand, continental balancing may offer a safety net for these extreme conditions – this is an argument for climate variability informed interconnections, as the identification of these patterns and weather types may provide information important for security of electricity supply (e.g. predictability/forecasting; interconnection capacity and location; spatial range of anomalies).
Relevancy for our research:
- How is Ireland’s ED related to these weather patterns? Can Ireland be a good neighbour of the UK/France for extreme WP and ED conditions? As in, are extreme conditions happening in in both countries at the same time?
- Is Ireland’s ED dependent on T as much as the UK’s ED is?
- What is the relationship between ED and WP, for Ireland?
- Answering these questions may facilitate future decisions on the production, transmission and consuming of electricity.
Eadaoin, João and Seánie had the chance to see Hazel Thornton presenting this work at the European Meteorological Society Conference in Dublin, September 2017. She also presented a follow up work of this article, which is about predicting some of these weather dependent variables using Met Office’s forecast system.